Skip to main content

Software · Software Engineering & Web

Adding four developers to a product team without breaking its velocity during onboarding

A French vendor with an eighteen-month backlog and a market that was not waiting. The challenge was not hiring fast but onboarding without collapsing the existing team's velocity.

Sector
Software
Size
85 employees, Series A
Service
Software Engineering & Web
Model
Dedicated team
Duration
14 months, ongoing

Context

The internal team had seven developers on a Node and React product deployed continuously. Two previous attempts at external reinforcement had ended with a departure after two months.

The problem

  • Eighteen-month product backlog at constant capacity
  • Two previous failed attempts at external reinforcement, wary team
  • Codebase with no onboarding documentation
  • Code review already saturated by the seven internal developers

What we did

  • Start with two developers, not four, on an isolated functional domain
  • Deliberately low-risk first assignment: writing the missing tests on the domain taken over
  • Onboarding documentation produced by the newcomers, reviewed by the internal team
  • Ramp to four developers after ten weeks, once code review flowed
  • An AzerOps tech lead absorbs first-pass review; the internal team only sees pre-reviewed code
  • Shared rituals in French, same tooling, same commit conventions

Results

10 sem.
before ramping to 4 profiles
0
departures in 14 months
+64 %
more tickets shipped per quarter
2
domains fully taken over

What remains

The internal team's velocity did not drop during onboarding, which was the CTO's stated condition. The two functional domains handed over are now maintained end to end by the AzerOps team, code review included.

« They refused to start with four when we asked for four. In hindsight, that is why it worked this time. »
Chief Technology Officer, B2B SaaS vendor

Stack

  • Node.js
  • React
  • TypeScript
  • PostgreSQL
  • GitHub Actions

Case studies

Twenty minutes is enough to know whether we are useful

No sales deck. You describe the need, we say whether it is in scope, at what price and on what timeline. If it is not for us, we say so during the call.